Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696115›Full record

ArticleJournal of food and drug analysis2020

Acute and subacute oral toxicity assessment of dry encapsulated and non-encapsulated green coffee fruit extracts.

Wanessa Costa Silva Faria, Alessandra Almeida da Silva, Natalie Veggi, Nair Honda Kawashita, Suelem A de França Lemes, Wander Miguel de Barros, Edemilson da Conceição Cardoso, Attilio Converti, Waldênia de Melo Moura, Neura Bragagnolo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wanessa Costa Silva FariaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-852, Campinas -SP, Brazil.
Alessandra Almeida da SilvaFaculty of Food Engineering, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Campus Cuiabá - Bela Vista, 78050-560, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil.
Natalie VeggiFaculty of Food Engineering, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Campus Cuiabá - Bela Vista, 78050-560, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil.
Nair Honda KawashitaLaboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Campus Cuiabá, 78060-900, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil.
Suelem A de França LemesLaboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Campus Cuiabá, 78060-900, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil.
Wander Miguel de BarrosFaculty of Food Engineering, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Campus Cuiabá - Bela Vista, 78050-560, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil.
Edemilson da Conceição CardosoLaboratory of Research, Development and Innovation of Bioproducts, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University Goiás (UFG), Campus Colemar Natal e Silva, 74605-170, Goiânia - GO, Brazil.
Attilio ConvertiDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genova, Pole of Chemical Engineering, Via Opera Pia 15, I-16145 Genoa, Italy.
Waldênia de Melo MouraAgricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 36.570-075, Viçosa - MG, Brazil.
Neura BragagnoloDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-852, Campinas -SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coffee fruit is a high source of bioactive compounds such as phenolic acids and methylxanthines, comprising chlorogenic acids and caffeine, respectively. Extract from this matrix may be used as supplement or active ingredient of functional foods, energy drinks, cosmetics or drugs. Safety of caffeine- and chlorogenic acid-rich encapsulated and non-encapsulated hydroethanolic extracts from green coffee fruit (GCFE) was assessed by acute and subacute toxicity tests. In the acute test, oral single dosage until 1000 mg/kg per body weight (bw) did not show any adverse effect on both female and male mice according to the Hippocratic screening and clinical parameters for a period of 14 days. While the oral median lethal dose of non-encapsulated GCFE was 5000 mg/kg bw/day, that of encapsulated GCFE was not detectable likely due to the delayed release of caffeine and other compounds from GCFE. Non-encapsulated GCFE displayed a stimulating effect at a dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/day after 30 min of oral administration, but not after 60 min. Daily consumption of encapsulated GCFE for 30 days showed no adverse effect in male rats even at the highest dose. Extrapolating this value of no-observed-adverse-effect level (1000 mg/kg bw/day) to human consumption, a human equivalent dose of 189 mg/kg bw/day or 11.34 g/day could be estimated for encapsulated GCFE considering a 60 kg adult body weight.

Identifiers

PMID35696115
PMCPMC9261855
OpenAlexW3036309547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.