Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696043›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2022

Patient perspectives on chronic kidney disease and decision-making about treatment. Discourse of participants in the French CKD-REIN cohort study.

Lucile Montalescot, Géraldine Dorard, Elodie Speyer, Karine Legrand, Carole Ayav, Christian Combe, Bénédicte Stengel, Aurélie Untas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Pilot Clinical Trial of a Nutrition Education Program on Quality of Life in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucile MontalescotUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, 30021, Nîmes Cedex 1, France. lucile.montalescot@unimes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-4481
Géraldine DorardUniversité de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Elodie SpeyerUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France.
Karine LegrandClinical Epidemiology, Inserm CIC-EC, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Carole AyavClinical Epidemiology, Inserm CIC-EC, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Christian CombeService de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèses, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, and Unité INSERM U1026, Bordeaux, France.
Bénédicte StengelUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France.
Aurélie UntasUniversité de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about psychological issues in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) facing transition to kidney failure and the involvement of their family in decision-making about kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This study investigated patients' experience of their illness, their views on KRT choice and their perception of the influence of their relatives.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study nested in the CKD-REIN prospective cohort study which included non-dialysis CKD patients from 40 nationally representative nephrology clinics. Among 1555 patients who returned a self-administered questionnaire, we used purposive sampling to select 50 participants who underwent semi-structured phone interviews with a psychologist.

resultsThe patients' mean age was 62.2 ± 12 years, 42% were women, and 68% had CKD stage 4-5. The analysis yielded four lexical classes: "illness rhythm", "considering dialysis", "family and transplantation", and "disease, treatment choice and introspection". When experiencing few or mild symptoms, patients tended to avoid thinking about CKD, for the prospect of dialysis was the most stressful part of their experience. Surprisingly, the importance of family appeared when they talked about transplantation decision-making, but not about choice of dialysis modality.

conclusionsCognitive avoidance seems common in patients with advanced CKD. Transplantation and dialysis decision-making appear to be two distinct processes, with different levels of family involvement. More research is needed to better understand the frequency and impact of cognitive avoidance on patients' well-being and decision-making.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyAdvanced CKDQualitative researchTreatment decision-making

Identifiers

PMID35696043
PMCPMC9217839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.