Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696033›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis to Generate Novel Traits in Bactrocera tryoni for Sterile Insect Technique.

Amanda Choo, Elisabeth Fung, Thu N M Nguyen, Anzu Okada, Peter Crisp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The shibireInsect science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Choo *School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. amanda.choo@adelaide.edu.au.
Elisabeth Fung *South Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Thu N M NguyenUniversity of Melbourne, Bio21 Institute, School of BioSciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anzu OkadaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter CrispSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
South Australian Research and Development Institute · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is a biocontrol strategy that has been widely utilized to suppress or eradicate outbreak populations of insect pests such as tephritid fruit flies. As SIT is highly favored due to it being species-specific and environmentally friendly, there are constant efforts to improve the efficiency and efficacy of this method in particular at low pest densities; one of which is the use of genetically enhanced strains. Development of these desirable strains has been facilitated by the emergence of the CRISPR/Cas genome-editing technology that enables the rapid and precise genomic modification of non-model organisms. Here, we describe the manual microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 reagents into tephritid pest Bactrocera tryoni (Queensland fruit fly) embryos to introduce ideal traits as well as the molecular methods used to detect successful mutagenesis.

Indexed as

TephritidaeAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingMutagenesisBactrocera tryoniCRISPR/Cas mutagenesisEmbryo microinjectionsGenetic sexing strainsQueensland fruit flySterile insect techniqueTephritids

Identifiers

PMID35696033
OpenAlexW4285137032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.