Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695993›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Decoding violated sensory expectations from the auditory cortex of anaesthetised mice: Hierarchical recurrent neural network depicts separate 'danger' and 'safety' units.

Jamie A O'Reilly, Thanate Angsuwatanakul, Jordan Wehrman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie A O'ReillyCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Lak Hok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2250-3077
Thanate AngsuwatanakulCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Lak Hok, Thailand.
Jordan WehrmanBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-6092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to respond appropriately to sensory information received from the external environment is among the most fundamental capabilities of central nervous systems. In the auditory domain, processes underlying this behaviour are studied by measuring auditory-evoked electrophysiology during sequences of sounds with predetermined regularities. Identifying neural correlates of ensuing auditory novelty responses is supported by research in experimental animals. In the present study, we reanalysed epidural field potential recordings from the auditory cortex of anaesthetised mice during frequency and intensity oddball stimulation. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and hierarchical recurrent neural network (RNN) modelling were adopted to explore these data with greater resolution than previously considered using conventional methods. Time-wise and generalised temporal decoding MVPA approaches revealed previously underestimated asymmetry between responses to sound-level transitions in the intensity oddball paradigm, in contrast with tone frequency changes. After training, the cross-validated RNN model architecture with four hidden layers produced output waveforms in response to simulated auditory inputs that were strongly correlated with grand-average auditory-evoked potential waveforms (r

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMiceMotivationNeural Networks, Computerauditory noveltyemergent computational physiologymismatch negativitymultivariate pattern analysisrecurrent neural networksensory processing

Identifiers

PMID35695993
PMCPMC9545291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.