Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695861›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

Mental health professionals' perspective on a brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for Afghan asylum seekers and refugees.

Matthias Knefel, Viktoria Kantor, Dina Weindl, Jennifer Schiess-Jokanovic, Andrew A Nicholson, Lucia Verginer, Ingo Schäfer, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthias KnefelFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0632-0673
Viktoria KantorFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-8123
Dina WeindlFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jennifer Schiess-JokanovicFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrew A NicholsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9483-5628
Lucia VerginerFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingo SchäferDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-3559
Brigitte Lueger-SchusterFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-8437
University of Vienna · ATMcMaster University · CAUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While many elaborated treatment protocols focus on post-traumatic stress symptoms, a large number of refugees suffer from a range of mental health problems. Thus, brief and transdiagnostic psychological interventions may be helpful first interventions for help-seeking refugees and asylum seekers in a stepped-care approach. Critically, there is limited research on how transdiagnostic interventions are received in general practice in non-specialized mental healthcare settings in high-income countries, where often only mental health professionals (MHPs) are legally allowed to treat people with mental disorders. MHPs may thus deliver such interventions, but their perspective towards them has not yet been investigated. Objective: We aimed to investigate MHPs' perception of the usability of adapted Problem Management Plus (aPM+), a brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for refugees, which we adapted to address distress caused by post-migration living difficulties (PMLDs). Method: Employing an e-learning tool, we introduced the aPM+ intervention to 59 MHPs and assessed their perspective towards the intervention. We then used an inductive approach to analyse their perspective towards the intervention with open-ended questions. Results: Altogether, 59 MHPs enrolled in the webinar and 29 provided feedback on the intervention. MHPs had a positive view on the intervention but emphasized the importance of situation-specific adaptations to the structure of the manual. The most favoured specific strategies were 'managing stress/slow-breathing', the 'tree of capabilities', and the 'riding the anger' exercise. The last two were additionally developed to reduce distress caused by PMLDs by either enhancing self-efficacy or reducing anger regulation difficulties. Conclusions: An adaptation to aPM+ regarding more flexibility of the manual may enhance the likelihood of MHPs implementing the intervention in their daily practice. Strategies addressing coping with PMLDs could be particularly helpful. HIGHLIGHTS: Mental health professionals had a positive view on a brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for refugees but emphasized the importance of situation-specific adaptations to the structure of the manual.Low -intensity interventions may be useful not only in low- and middle-income countries but also in high-income countries as part of a stepped-care approach, even if distributed by MHPs instead of trained laypersons.

Indexed as

RefugeesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAnxietyHumansMental HealthPsychosocial Interventionafghanistanlow threshold interventionsMental health professionalsrefugeeswebinar

Identifiers

PMID35695861
PMCPMC9176353
OpenAlexW4281769848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.