Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695860›Full record

ArticleMachine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop)2021

Seeking an Optimal Approach for Computer-Aided Pulmonary Embolism Detection.

Nahid Ul Islam, Shiv Gehlot, Zongwei Zhou, Michael B Gotway, Jianming Liang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
34.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Benchmarking and Boosting Transformers for Medical Image Classification.Domain adaptation and representation transfer : 4th MICCAI Workshop, DART 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer (Workshop) (4th : 2022 : Sin... · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nahid Ul IslamArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Shiv GehlotArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Zongwei ZhouArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Michael B GotwayMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Jianming LiangArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Arizona State University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismR01HL128785 · NHLBI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LIANG, JIANMING · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a thrombus ("blood clot"), usually originating from a lower extremity vein, that travels to the blood vessels in the lung, causing vascular obstruction and in some patients, death. This disorder is commonly diagnosed using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Deep learning holds great promise for the computer-aided CTPA diagnosis (CAD) of PE. However, numerous competing methods for a given task in the deep learning literature exist, causing great confusion regarding the development of a CAD PE system. To address this confusion, we present a comprehensive analysis of competing deep learning methods applicable to PE diagnosis using CTPA at the both image and exam levels. At the image level, we compare convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with vision transformers, and contrast self-supervised learning (SSL) with supervised learning, followed by an evaluation of transfer learning compared with training from scratch. At the exam level, we focus on comparing conventional classification (CC) with multiple instance learning (MIL). Our extensive experiments consistently show: (1) transfer learning consistently boosts performance despite differences between natural images and CT scans, (2) transfer learning with SSL surpasses its supervised counterparts; (3) CNNs outperform vision transformers, which otherwise show satisfactory performance; and (4) CC is, surprisingly, superior to MIL. Compared with the state of the art, our optimal approach provides an AUC gain of 0.2% and 1.05% for image-level and exam-level, respectively.

Indexed as

CNNsMultiple Instance LearningPulmonary EmbolismSelf-Supervised LearningTransfer LearningVision Transformers

Identifiers

PMID35695860
PMCPMC9184235
OpenAlexW3203937614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.