ArticleJournal of nursing doctoral students scholarship2022
A Brief Theory Critique: The Theory of Moral Reckoning.
Article in Journal of nursing doctoral students scholarship, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Moral Reckoning.ANS. Advances in nursing scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Nurses continually face moral dilemmas and endure moral distress. As a result, nurses experience emotional, physical, and professional consequences. When nurses experience moral distress the nursing workforce is hurt, and patient outcomes suffer. The theory of Moral Reckoning is a framework to understand how nurses process the experience of moral distress. Theory critique is a tool to test the functionality of a theory. This brief theory critique of Moral Reckoning examines the theory's application value.
Identifiers
35695842PMC9187298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.