ArticleMachine learning in clinical neuroimaging and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology : Third International Workshop, MLCN 2020, and Second International Workshop, RNO-AI 2020, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4-8, 2020...2020
Generalizing MRI Subcortical Segmentation to Neurodegeneration.
Article in Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology : Third International Workshop, MLCN 2020, and Second International Workshop, RNO-AI 2020, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4-8, 2020..., 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive review of reinforcement learning for medical ultrasound imaging.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Comprehensive shape analysis of the cortex in Huntington's disease.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- MRI subcortical segmentation in neurodegeneration with cascaded 3D CNNs.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Longitudinal subcortical segmentation with deep learning.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many neurodegenerative diseases like Huntington's disease (HD) affect the subcortical structures of the brain, especially the caudate and the putamen. Automated segmentation of subcortical structures from MRI scans is thus important in HD studies. LiviaNET [2] is the state-of-the-art deep learning approach for subcortical segmentation. As all learning-based models, this approach requires appropriate training data. While annotated healthy control images are relatively easy to obtain, generating such annotations for each new disease population can be prohibitively expensive. In this work, we explore LiviaNET variants using well-known strategies for improving performance, to make it more generalizable to patients with substantial neurodegeneration. Specifically, we explored Res-blocks in our convolutional neural network, and we also explored manipulating the input to the network as well as random elastic deformations for data augmentation. We tested our method on images from the PREDICT-HD dataset, which includes control and HD subjects. We trained on control subjects and tested on both controls and HD patients. Compared to the original LiviaNET, we improved the accuracy of most structures, both for controls and for HD patients. The caudate has the most pronounced improvement in HD subjects with the proposed modifications to LiviaNET, which is noteworthy since caudate is known to be severely atrophied in HD. This suggests our extensions may improve the generalization ability of LiviaNET to cohorts where significant neurodegeneration is present, without needing to be retrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.