Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695526›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Infusion Regimens in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model against Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

María Milagro Montero, Sandra Domene-Ochoa, Carla López-Causapé, Inmaculada López-Montesinos, Sonia Luque, Luisa Sorlí, Núria Campillo, Eduardo Padilla, Núria Prim, Lorena Ferrer Alapont and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TargetingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Difficult-to-TreatAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

María Milagro MonteroInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-6804
Sandra Domene-OchoaInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Carla López-CausapéServicio de Microbiología y Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Son Espases, IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Inmaculada López-MontesinosInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonia LuquePharmacy Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3215-320X
Luisa SorlíInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria CampilloPharmacy Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduardo PadillaLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria PrimLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena Ferrer AlapontInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago GrauPharmacy Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio OliverServicio de Microbiología y Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Son Espases, IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9327-1894
Juan P HorcajadaInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-5459
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intermittent (1-h), extended (4-h), and continuous ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) infusion against three extensively drug-resistant (XDR) sequence type (ST) 175 P. aeruginosa isolates with different susceptibilities to C/T (MIC = 2 to 16 mg/L) in a 7-day hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). C/T in continuous infusion achieved the largest reduction in total number of bacterial colonies in the overall treatment arms for both C/T-susceptible and -resistant isolates. It was also the only regimen with bactericidal activity against all three isolates. These data suggest that continuous C/T infusion should be considered a potential treatment for infections caused by XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, including nonsusceptible ones. Proper use of C/T dosing regimens may lead to better clinical management of XDR P. aeruginosa infections.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTazobactamAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftolozaneCephalosporinsTazobactamceftolozane/tazobactamhollow-fiberPK/PDPseudomonas aeruginosaXDR

Identifiers

PMID35695526
PMCPMC9241897
OpenAlexW4282586626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.