Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695458›Full record

ArticlemBio2022

Antibiotic Minimal Selective Concentrations and Fitness Costs during Biofilm and Planktonic Growth.

Karin Hjort, Elin Fermér, Po-Cheng Tang, Dan I Andersson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alternate Antimicrobial Therapies and Their Companion Tests.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin HjortDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala Universitygrid.8993.b, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elin FermérDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala Universitygrid.8993.b, Uppsala, Sweden.
Po-Cheng TangDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala Universitygrid.8993.b, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala Universitygrid.8993.b, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-2174
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use and misuse of antibiotics have resulted in the selection of difficult-to-treat resistant bacteria. Two key parameters that influence the selection of resistant bacteria are the minimal selective concentration (MSC) and the fitness cost of resistance, both of which have been measured during planktonic growth in several studies. However, bacterial growth most often occurs in biofilms, and it is unclear if and how these parameters differ under these two growth conditions. To address this knowledge gap, we compared a selection of several types of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli mutants during planktonic and biofilm growth to determine the fitness costs and MSCs. Biofilm-forming Escherichia coli strains are commonly found in catheter-associated and recurrent urinary tract infections. Isogenic strains of a biofilm-forming E. coli strain, differing only in the resistance mechanisms and the fluorescent markers, were constructed, and susceptible and resistant bacteria were grown in head-to-head competitions at various concentrations of antibiotics under planktonic and biofilm conditions. Mutants with resistance to five different antibiotics were studied. The results show that during both planktonic and biofilm growth, selection for the resistant mutants occurred for all antibiotics at sub-MICs far below the MIC of the antibiotic. Even though differences were seen, the MSC values and the fitness costs did not differ systematically between planktonic and biofilm growth, implying that despite the different growth modes, the basic selection parameters are similar. These findings highlight the risk that resistant mutants may, similarly to planktonic growth, also be selected at sub-MICs of antibiotics in biofilms.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli InfectionsBiofilmsEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlanktonAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistancebiofilmsEscherichia colifitnessminimal selective concentrationplanktonic

Identifiers

PMID35695458
PMCPMC9239065
OpenAlexW4282821964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.