ArticlemBio2022
Antibiotic Minimal Selective Concentrations and Fitness Costs during Biofilm and Planktonic Growth.
Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular and environmental drivers of antimicrobial resistance: global epidemiology, resistome dynamics, and one health strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Fitness cost and biofilm formation in fosfomycin-resistant clinicalTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Selection for florfenicol resistance at sub-MIC concentrations in Pasteurella multocida.PloS one · 2025Article
- Determination of the De Novo Minimum Selection Concentration of Trimethoprim In Vivo forMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Mixed species biofilms act as planktonic cell factories despite isothiazolinone exposure under continuous-flow conditions.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Highlighting the limitations of static microplate biofilm assays for industrial biocide effectiveness compared to dynamic flow conditions.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- The sub-MIC selective window decreases along the digestive tract: determination of the minimal selective concentration of oxytetracycline in sterilised intestinal contents.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Alternate Antimicrobial Therapies and Their Companion Tests.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility through an experimental evolutionary lens.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use and misuse of antibiotics have resulted in the selection of difficult-to-treat resistant bacteria. Two key parameters that influence the selection of resistant bacteria are the minimal selective concentration (MSC) and the fitness cost of resistance, both of which have been measured during planktonic growth in several studies. However, bacterial growth most often occurs in biofilms, and it is unclear if and how these parameters differ under these two growth conditions. To address this knowledge gap, we compared a selection of several types of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli mutants during planktonic and biofilm growth to determine the fitness costs and MSCs. Biofilm-forming Escherichia coli strains are commonly found in catheter-associated and recurrent urinary tract infections. Isogenic strains of a biofilm-forming E. coli strain, differing only in the resistance mechanisms and the fluorescent markers, were constructed, and susceptible and resistant bacteria were grown in head-to-head competitions at various concentrations of antibiotics under planktonic and biofilm conditions. Mutants with resistance to five different antibiotics were studied. The results show that during both planktonic and biofilm growth, selection for the resistant mutants occurred for all antibiotics at sub-MICs far below the MIC of the antibiotic. Even though differences were seen, the MSC values and the fitness costs did not differ systematically between planktonic and biofilm growth, implying that despite the different growth modes, the basic selection parameters are similar. These findings highlight the risk that resistant mutants may, similarly to planktonic growth, also be selected at sub-MICs of antibiotics in biofilms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.