Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35695247›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2022

Analyzing the overall effects of the microbiome abundance data with a Bayesian predictive value approach.

Xinyan Zhang, Nengjun Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyan ZhangSchool of Data Science and Analytics, 548957Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8274-8711
Nengjun YiDepartment of Biostatistics, 48653University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

Methods and Health Informatics CoreP30AR072583 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JEFFREY R. CURTIS · 2020 to 2026
$5.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome abundance data is known to be over-dispersed and sparse count data. Among various zero-inflated models, zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model and zero-inflated beta binomial (ZIBB) model are the methods to analyze the microbiome abundance data. ZINB and ZIBB have two sets of parameters, which are for modeling the zero-inflation part and the count part separately. Most previous methods have focused on making inferences in terms of separate case-control effect for the zero-inflation part and the count part. However, in a case-control study, the primary interest is normally focused on the inference and a single interpretation of the overall unconditional mean (also known as the overall effect) of the microbiome abundance in microbiome studies. Here, we propose a Bayesian predictive value (BPV) approach to estimate the overall effect of the microbiome abundance. This approach is implemented based on R package

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalBayesian predictive valueMCMCmicrobiomeoverall effectsoverall unconditional meanzero-inflated count models

Identifiers

PMID35695247
PMCPMC10395189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.