Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694847›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2022

Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio-economic disadvantage in Australia.

Jedidiah I Morton, Jenni Ilomӓki, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio-economic disadvantage in Australia.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jedidiah I MortonBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3231-5758
Jenni IlomӓkiSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dianna J MaglianoBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan E ShawBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown how use of newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) has changed in Australia following the publication of clinical trials demonstrating definitive clinical advantages for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and whether this varies by socio-economic disadvantage.

methodsWe included 1,064,645 people with type 2 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme. This cohort was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database to evaluate trends in diabetes medication receipt and variation by socio-economic disadvantage between 2013 and 2019.

resultsThe proportion of people with type 2 diabetes receiving ≥3 GLDs concurrently increased from 12% in 2013 to 25% in 2019. By 2019, 6% of people with diabetes were receiving a GLP-1 RA and 21% an SGLT2i. Disparities in receipt of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2is by socio-economic disadvantage decreased over time (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged quintile were 0.80 [0.77-0.85] and 0.87 [0.82-0.94] in 2014 and 0.95 [0.92-0.98] and 1.07 [1.05-1.09] in 2019 for GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2is, respectively). However, people in more disadvantaged areas were more likely to receive multiple GLDs. After stratifying by number of concurrent GLDs received, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2is in 2019 (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged: 0.81 [0.78-0.84] and 0.90 [0.87-0.93] for people receiving ≥3 GLDs, respectively).

conclusionsAfter controlling for intensity of glucose-lowering therapy, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive cardioprotective GLDs, although disparities decreased over time.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAustraliaGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsSocioeconomic FactorsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35694847
PMCPMC9545050
OpenAlexW4282822967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.