Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694798›Full record

SynthesisMedical education online2022

A systematic review of online education initiatives to develop students remote caring skills and practices.

Lorelli Nowell, Swati Dhingra, Sandra Carless-Kane, Claire McGuinness, Alessandra Paolucci, Michele Jacobsen, Diane L Lorenzetti, Liza Lorenzetti, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical education online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Students' Assessment of Digital Technologies in Nursing Education.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorelli NowellFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-4462
Swati DhingraFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sandra Carless-KaneFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Claire McGuinnessWerklund School of Education, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alessandra PaolucciDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Michele JacobsenWerklund School of Education, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0639-7606
Diane L LorenzettiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Liza LorenzettiFaculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-4183
Elizabeth Oddone PaolucciDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has altered caring professions education and the range of technological competencies needed to thrive in today's digital economy. We aimed to identify the various technologies and design strategies being used to help students develop and translate professional caring competencies into remote working environments. Eight databases were systematically searched in February 2021 for relevant studies. Studies reporting on online learning strategies designed to prepare students to operate in emerging digital economies were included. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool and/or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Thirty-eight studies were included and synthesized to report on course details, including technologies being used and design strategies, and study outcomes including curriculum, barriers and facilitators to technology integration, impact on students, and impact on professional practice. Demonstrations of remote care, videoconferencing, online modules, and remote consultation with patients were the most common instructional methods. Audio/video conferencing and online learning systems were the most prevalent technologies used to support student learning. Students reported increased comfort and confidence when working with technology and planning and providing remote care to patients. While a recent influx in research related to online learning and caring technologies was noted, study quality remains variable. More emphasis on assessment, training, and research is required to support students in using digital technologies and developing interpersonal and technological skills required to work in remote settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceHumansLearningPandemicsStudentsCaring professionsinnovationonline educationremote caresystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID35694798
PMCPMC9196772
OpenAlexW4281742922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.