Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694774›Full record

ArticleEMBO molecular medicine2022

Longitudinal monitoring of disease burden and response using ctDNA from dried blood spots in xenograft models.

Carolin M Sauer, Katrin Heider, Jelena Belic, Samantha E Boyle, James A Hall, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Angela An, Aadhitthya Vijayaraghavan, Marika Av Reinius, Karen Hosking and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolin M Sauer *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2168-6630
Katrin Heider *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-1668
Jelena BelicCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Samantha E BoyleCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
James A HallCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Dominique-Laurent CouturierCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Angela AnCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Aadhitthya VijayaraghavanCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marika Av ReiniusCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9778-3317
Karen HoskingCancer Research UK Major Centre-Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Maria ViasCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4955-0102
Nitzan Rosenfeld *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-4788
James D Brenton *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-6683
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

TOBACCO FLAVOR COMPOUNDSP01CA029580 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR CANCER PREVENTION · 1985 to 1995
–
Cancer Research UK 11906Cancer Research UK 20240Cancer Research UK 27548Cancer Research UK 28292Cancer Research UK A20240Cancer Research UK A22905Cancer Research UK A25117Cancer Research UK A25177Cancer Research UK A29580Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is now a clinically important biomarker for predicting therapy response, disease burden and disease progression. However, the translation of ctDNA monitoring into vital preclinical PDX models has not been possible owing to low circulating blood volumes in small rodents. Here, we describe the longitudinal detection and monitoring of ctDNA from minute volumes of blood in PDX mice. We developed a xenograft Tumour Fraction (xTF) metric using shallow WGS of dried blood spots (DBS), and demonstrate its application to quantify disease burden, monitor treatment response and predict disease outcome in a preclinical study of PDX mice. Further, we show how our DBS-based ctDNA assay can be used to detect gene-specific copy number changes and examine the copy number landscape over time. Use of sequential DBS ctDNA assays could transform future trial designs in both mice and patients by enabling increased sampling and molecular monitoring.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCost of IllnessHeterograftsMiceBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcirculating tumour DNAcopy number aberrationsliquid biopsiesPDX modelspreclinical treatment study

Identifiers

PMID35694774
PMCPMC9358392
OpenAlexW4282838754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.