Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694757›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.

Emma L Berdan, Thomas Flatt, Genevieve M Kozak, Katie E Lotterhos, Ben Wielstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma L BerdanInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-4604
Thomas FlattDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5990-1503
Genevieve M KozakDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, MA 02747, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-1403
Katie E LotterhosDepartment of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, 430 Nahant Road, Nahant, MA 01908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-2771
Ben WielstraInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7112-5965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supergenes are tightly linked sets of loci that are inherited together and control complex phenotypes. While classical supergenes-governing traits such as wing patterns in

Indexed as

ButterfliesAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenes, InsectGenomicsWings, Animalgenomic architecturestructural variationsupergene

Identifiers

PMID35694757
PMCPMC9189501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.