Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694751›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimic

Shinya Komata, Rei Kajitani, Takehiko Itoh, Haruhiko Fujiwara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosomal inversions and their impact on insect evolution.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stepwise evolution of a butterfly supergene via duplication and inversion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Frontiers in insect science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shinya KomataDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8562, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-6344
Rei KajitaniSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5013-0052
Takehiko ItohSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-557X
Haruhiko FujiwaraDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8562, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-9929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been suggested that dimorphic female-limited Batesian mimicry of two closely related

Indexed as

Biological MimicryButterfliesAnimalsChromosome InversionFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsWings, Animalchromosomal inversionfemale-limited polymorphic mimicrylinkage disequilibriumPapilio butterfliessupergenetransposon

Identifiers

PMID35694751
PMCPMC9189499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.