ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Comparative Analysis of Physical Activity Detected
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between activity and sleep, as measured through a wearable accelerometer, and appropriate cardioverter defibrillator interventions: a prospective SafeHeart substudy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) has become an important health issue for decades. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have built-in PA-recording functions. We aimed to compare PA measurements using an external accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) and internal accelerometers (Abbott, Biotronik, and Medtronic CIEDs). Methods: This was a prospective, single-center observational study. The device-measured 7-day average PA was collected, and GT3X+ -measured 7-day average PA was used as the gold-standard, including all daily observations of activity. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to compare the correlations between GT3X+ -measured and CIED-measured PA. Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze measurement agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze reliability. Results: In total, 720 patients treated with CIEDs were surveyed between November 2020 and April 2021, 60 of them were analyzed after patient screening by our protocol. Each manufacturer included 20 patients for the final analysis. The CIED-measured PAs of Abbott, Biotronik, and Medtronic were 3.0 ± 1.5, 2.6 ± 1.8, and 3.8 ± 2.5 h per day, respectively; the GT3X+ -measured PAs were 6.9 ± 2.8, 6.0 ± 2.4, and 6.4 ± 2.5 h per day, respectively. Moderate and significant correlations were found in patients using Abbott, Biotronik, and Medtronic CIEDs ( Conclusion: Although the PA recording function of CIEDs includes a single-axis accelerometer, it has a moderate correlation compared with the triaxial accelerometer of the GT3X+. However, CIEDs seem to underestimate PA for 3-4 h compared to the GT3X+.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.