Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694644›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2021

Trust in the jury system: a comparison of Australian and U.S. samples.

Monica K Miller, Jeffrey Pfeifer, Brian H Bornstein, Tatyana Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica K MillerInterdisciplinary Social Psychology PhD Program and Criminal Justice Department, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Jeffrey PfeiferDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brian H BornsteinPsychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Tatyana KaplanInterdisciplinary Social Psychology PhD Program, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · USNew School · USSwinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public trust in the criminal justice system, including the jury system, is important for maintaining a democracy that is fair for all citizens. However, there is little research on trust in the jury system generally and even less

Indexed as

Attributions of crimecross-national jury comparisonsfairnessinstitutional trustjust world beliefslegal attitudeslegal authoritarianismtrust in jury system

Identifiers

PMID35694644
PMCPMC9176378
OpenAlexW3128875359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.