ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2021
Linking Free Text Documentation of Functioning and Disability to the ICF With Natural Language Processing.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-site benchmarking framework for scalable extraction of geriatric care constructs from electronic health records.npj health systems · 2026Article
- The promise and peril of AI for disability health equity: A justice-centered narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- MedADL: high-throughput information extraction of functional status from electronic health records to advance frailty assessment in older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mobility functional status ascertainment in electronic health records using large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A call for action to strengthen stakeholder readiness for ICF data exchange in European health data space: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Using graph machine learning to identify functioning in patients with low back pain in terms of ICF.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of an ontology to characterize mental functioning.Disability and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Natural language processing systems for extracting information from electronic health records about activities of daily living. A systematic review.JAMIA open · 2024Review
- Mining Clinical Notes for Physical Rehabilitation Exercise Information: Natural Language Processing Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- FedFSA: Hybrid and federated framework for functional status ascertainment across institutions.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- Natural Language Processing to Classify Caregiver Strategies Supporting Participation Among Children and Youth with Craniofacial Microsomia and Other Childhood-Onset Disabilities.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Gross motor function prediction using natural language processing in cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Article
- A roadmap to reduce information inequities in disability with digital health and natural language processing.PLOS digital health · 2022Review
- Capturing and Operationalizing Participation in Pediatric Re/Habilitation Research Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Invaluable information on patient functioning and the complex interactions that define it is recorded in free text portions of the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Leveraging this information to improve clinical decision-making and conduct research requires natural language processing (NLP) technologies to identify and organize the information recorded in clinical documentation. Methods: We used natural language processing methods to analyze information about patient functioning recorded in two collections of clinical documents pertaining to claims for federal disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA). We grounded our analysis in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), and used the Activities and Participation domain of the ICF to classify information about functioning in three key areas: mobility, self-care, and domestic life. After annotating functional status information in our datasets through expert clinical review, we trained machine learning-based NLP models to automatically assign ICF categories to mentions of functional activity. Results: We found that rich and diverse information on patient functioning was documented in the free text records. Annotation of 289 documents for Mobility information yielded 2,455 mentions of Mobility activities and 3,176 specific actions corresponding to 13 ICF-based categories. Annotation of 329 documents for Self-Care and Domestic Life information yielded 3,990 activity mentions and 4,665 specific actions corresponding to 16 ICF-based categories. NLP systems for automated ICF coding achieved over 80% macro-averaged F-measure on both datasets, indicating strong performance across all ICF categories used. Conclusions: Natural language processing can help to navigate the tradeoff between flexible and expressive clinical documentation of functioning and standardizable data for comparability and learning. The ICF has practical limitations for classifying functional status information in clinical documentation but presents a valuable framework for organizing the information recorded in health records about patient functioning. This study advances the development of robust, ICF-based NLP technologies to analyze information on patient functioning and has significant implications for NLP-powered analysis of functional status information in disability benefits management, clinical care, and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.