Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2021

Linking Free Text Documentation of Functioning and Disability to the ICF With Natural Language Processing.

Denis Newman-Griffis, Jonathan Camacho Maldonado, Pei-Shu Ho, Maryanne Sacco, Rafael Jimenez Silva, Julia Porcino, Leighton Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Denis Newman-GriffisRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jonathan Camacho MaldonadoRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Pei-Shu HoRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Maryanne SaccoRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Rafael Jimenez SilvaRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Julia PorcinoRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Leighton ChanRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Analyzing the SSA Disability Evaluation ProcessZIACL060065 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI CHAN, LEIGHTON · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL060065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Invaluable information on patient functioning and the complex interactions that define it is recorded in free text portions of the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Leveraging this information to improve clinical decision-making and conduct research requires natural language processing (NLP) technologies to identify and organize the information recorded in clinical documentation. Methods: We used natural language processing methods to analyze information about patient functioning recorded in two collections of clinical documents pertaining to claims for federal disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA). We grounded our analysis in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), and used the Activities and Participation domain of the ICF to classify information about functioning in three key areas: mobility, self-care, and domestic life. After annotating functional status information in our datasets through expert clinical review, we trained machine learning-based NLP models to automatically assign ICF categories to mentions of functional activity. Results: We found that rich and diverse information on patient functioning was documented in the free text records. Annotation of 289 documents for Mobility information yielded 2,455 mentions of Mobility activities and 3,176 specific actions corresponding to 13 ICF-based categories. Annotation of 329 documents for Self-Care and Domestic Life information yielded 3,990 activity mentions and 4,665 specific actions corresponding to 16 ICF-based categories. NLP systems for automated ICF coding achieved over 80% macro-averaged F-measure on both datasets, indicating strong performance across all ICF categories used. Conclusions: Natural language processing can help to navigate the tradeoff between flexible and expressive clinical documentation of functioning and standardizable data for comparability and learning. The ICF has practical limitations for classifying functional status information in clinical documentation but presents a valuable framework for organizing the information recorded in health records about patient functioning. This study advances the development of robust, ICF-based NLP technologies to analyze information on patient functioning and has significant implications for NLP-powered analysis of functional status information in disability benefits management, clinical care, and research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical codingdisability evaluationelectronic health recordsfunctional statusICFinternational classification of functioning disability and healthnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID35694445
PMCPMC9180751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.