Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694384›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Genomic insights into

Adriana Ene, Natalie Stegman, Alan Wolfe, Catherine Putonti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Draft genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana EneBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Natalie StegmanBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Alan WolfeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, IL, United States of America.
Catherine PutontiBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Loyola University Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial and antifungal species are essential members of the healthy human microbiota. Several different species of lactobacilli that naturally inhabit the human body have been explored for their probiotic capabilities including strains of the species Methods: Here, we present a genomic investigation of all ( Results: The two species cannot be distinguished from short-read sequencing of the 16S rRNA as the full-length gene sequences differ only by two nucleotides. Based upon average nucleotide identity (ANI), we identified 20 strains deposited as

Indexed as

Lactobacillus gasseriFemaleGenomicsHumansLactobacillusMouthProphagesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SComparative genomicsGassericinHuman microbiomeLactobacillus gasseriLactobacillus paragasseriUrobiome

Identifiers

PMID35694384
PMCPMC9186330
OpenAlexW4281718946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.