Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694379›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Storage media and RNA extraction approaches substantially influence the recovery and integrity of livestock fecal microbial RNA.

Raju Koorakula, Mahdi Ghanbari, Matteo Schiavinato, Gertrude Wegl, Juliane C Dohm, Konrad J Domig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raju KoorakulaUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, Vienna, Austria.
Mahdi GhanbariDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Matteo SchiavinatoUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Computational Biology, Vienna, Austria.
Gertrude WeglDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Juliane C DohmUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Computational Biology, Vienna, Austria.
Konrad J DomigUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-4284
BOKU University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in understanding gut microbiome dynamics, to increase the sustainability of livestock production systems and to better understand the dynamics that regulate antibiotic resistance genes ( Methods: Fecal samples from pigs and chicken were collected from conventional slaughterhouses. Two different storage buffers were used at two different storage temperatures. The extraction of total RNA was done using four different commercially available kits and RNA integrity/quality and concentration were measured using a Bioanalyzer 2100 system with RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In addition, RT-qPCR was used to assess bacterial RNA quality and the level of host RNA contamination. Results: The quantity and quality of RNA differed by sample type ( Conclusion: Our findings provided a further emphasis on using a consistent methodology for sample storage, duration as well as a compatible RNA extraction approach. This is crucial as the impact of these technical steps can be potentially large compared with the real biological variability to be explained in microbiome and resistome studies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFecesLivestockRNASwineRNAChicken fecesLivestock microbiomeMetatranscriptomicsPig fecesRNA-extractionRT-qPCRSample storage

Identifiers

PMID35694379
PMCPMC9186325
OpenAlexW4281689584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.