Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694278›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022

Motion Measurement and Analysis of Different Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery.

Kunyong Lyu, Lixiao Yang, Chengli Song

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kunyong LyuSchool of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Lixiao YangEquipment Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Chengli SongShanghai Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-9700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To objectively compare and analyze the range of motion of three types of instruments for single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Results: There was a significant difference in operation time between groups (D < A < B < C, Conclusion: Different types of instruments have different ranges of motion in single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Working with precurved instruments seems like a compromise to traditional laparoscopic surgery if the transmission property, and shaft curvature of the instruments could be improved. An integrated mechanical platform or robotic system might be the ultimate solution for single-incision laparoscopic surgery to pursue even less trauma.

Identifiers

PMID35694278
PMCPMC9177342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.