Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694241›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2022

A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of a Nutrition Behavior Change Intervention Delivered Through Women's Self-Help Groups in Rural India: Impacts on Maternal and Young Child Diets, Anthropometry, and Intermediate Outcomes.

Samuel Scott, Shivani Gupta, Purnima Menon, Kalyani Raghunathan, Giang Thai, Agnes Quisumbing, Vandana Prasad, Aditi Hegde, Avijit Choudhury, Madhu Khetan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel ScottPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-0510
Shivani GuptaPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Purnima MenonPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-2894
Kalyani RaghunathanPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-4351
Giang ThaiPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Agnes QuisumbingPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-1857
Vandana PrasadPublic Health Resource Society (PHRS), New Delhi, India.
Aditi HegdePublic Health Resource Society (PHRS), New Delhi, India.
Avijit ChoudhuryProfessional Assistance for Development Action (PRADAN), New Delhi, India.
Madhu KhetanProfessional Assistance for Development Action (PRADAN), New Delhi, India.
Carly NicholsGeographical and Sustainability Studies Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Neha KumarPoverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
International Food Policy Research Institute · USNational Health Systems Resource Centre · INProfessional Assistance for Development Action · INUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women's self-help groups (SHGs) have become one of the largest institutional platforms serving the poor. Nutrition behavior change communication (BCC) interventions delivered through SHGs can improve maternal and child nutrition outcomes. Objectives: The objective was to understand the effects of a nutrition BCC intervention delivered through SHGs in rural India on intermediate outcomes and nutrition outcomes. Methods: We compared 16 matched blocks where communities were supported to form SHGs and improve livelihoods; 8 blocks received a 3-y nutrition intensive (NI) intervention with nutrition BCC, and agriculture- and rights-based information, facilitated by a trained female volunteer; another 8 blocks received standard activities (STD) to support savings/livelihoods. Repeated cross-sectional surveys of mother-child pairs were conducted in 2017-2018 ( Results: Forty percent of women were SHG members and 50% were from households with ≥1 SHG member. Only 10% of women in NI blocks had heard of intervention content at endline. Knowledge improved in both NI and STD groups. There was a positive NI impact on knowledge of timely introduction of animal-sourced foods to children ( Conclusions: Limited impacts could be due to limited exposure or skills of volunteers, and a concurrent national nutrition campaign. Our findings add to a growing literature on SHG-based BCC interventions and the conditions necessary for their success.

Indexed as

anthropometrybehavior change communicationIndiainfant and young child feedingwomen's self-help groups

Identifiers

PMID35694241
PMCPMC9177383
OpenAlexW4223614086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.