Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694140›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2022

Patient satisfaction with virtual evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of CRPS.

Emma Loy, Anna Scheidler, Tara Packham, Heather Dow, Paul Winston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emma LoyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Anna ScheidlerFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tara PackhamSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-1975
Heather DowCanadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Paul WinstonDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-6988
University of British Columbia · CACanadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · CADalhousie University · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased reliance on virtual care in the rehabilitation setting for patients with conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Aims: The aim of this study was to perform a quality improvement initiative to assess patient satisfaction and ensure that outcomes following virtual assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of CRPS with prednisone are safe and effective. Methods: An online survey was distributed to 18 patients with CRPS who had been seen virtually between March and December 2020 through a rehabilitation clinic and treated with oral prednisone. Thirteen participants completed the survey, which was designed de novo by our team to evaluate participant perceptions and satisfaction regarding the virtual care experience. Also included in the survey was a CRPS-specific validated patient-report questionnaire (Hamilton Inventory for CRPS: PR-HI-CRPS), which allowed participants to describe their specific symptoms and associated functional and psychosocial impacts, both previously (pretreatment baseline) and at the time of survey (posttreatment). Results: CRPS symptoms and related impacts were scored as significantly improved from baseline following treatment with prednisone. Likert scale results from survey responses related to patients' experiences and satisfaction with the virtual care process were analyzed; the majority of patients reported satisfaction with a virtual appointment for evaluation of CRPS, as well as with subsequent treatment decisions based on virtual assessment. Conclusions: This quality improvement study suggests that virtual care is a potential option for a patient-accepted approach to overcoming challenges with in-person care imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and could help inform future considerations in addressing geographic and patient-specific disparities in access to specialist care for CRPS.

Indexed as

complex regional pain syndromeCRPSe-healthphysiatryphysical medicine and rehabilitationtelehealthtelemedicinevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID35694140
PMCPMC9176228
OpenAlexW4226071548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.