Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694042›Full record

ArticleMindfulness2020

Associations between mindfulness and mental health outcomes: A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment research.

Matthew C Enkema, Lauren McClain, Elizabeth R Bird, Max A Halvorson, Mary E Larimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mindfulness, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Momentary effects of life stressors on mindfulness and emotion regulation difficulties among adolescents exposed to chronic stressors.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring within and between associations of momentary mindfulness and emotion regulation and the moderating effects of mental health among adolescents.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mind Your Heart: A Mindful Eating and Diet Education eHealth Program.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew C EnkemaCenter for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354944, 1100 NE 45 St, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Lauren McClainCenter for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354944, 1100 NE 45 St, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Elizabeth R BirdCenter for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354944, 1100 NE 45 St, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Max A HalvorsonUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Mary E LarimerCenter for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354944, 1100 NE 45 St, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Funding

Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Characterizing the Role of Avoidant Coping in the Development of Drinking to Cope with Negative EmotionsF31AA027118 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HALVORSON, MAX A · 2018 to 2020
$117k
An investigation of craving and cannabis misuse among young adults using multiple levels of analysisF31DA042503 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ENKEMA, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2017
$80k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA027118NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA042503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Psychological science has taken up investigations of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs (MBPs) and mechanisms through which people benefit from mindfulness. Reliable and valid psychometric tools are essential components of psychological science, and efforts have been made to produce tools for the accurate measurement of mindfulness as a construct. However, trait measurement methods, which are commonly used, may not adequately assess mindfulness and mental health outcomes in a way that allows for mechanisms to be adequately tested. Intensive longitudinal assessment methods sample behavior and experience multiple times over a brief period of several days or weeks, and may be more appropriate methods for testing mechanisms of action. We provide a systematic review of published, peer-reviewed studies that used intensive longitudinal methods to investigate the effects of mindfulness on mental health outcomes. Methods: Articles were included in the systematic review if mindfulness measures and/or mindfulness interventions were a part of the study design and if intensive longitudinal methods were used to assess mindfulness or mental health outcomes. Results: Findings consistently demonstrated a positive association between mindfulness and mental health. Only two studies collected both trait and state measurements of either mindfulness or mental health outcomes, and results indicated that EMA produced larger effect sizes between mindfulness and mental health outcomes. Conclusions: Theorized associations between mindfulness and mental health are supported by the current EMA literature. Intensive longitudinal methods may produce more consistent and reliable results through increased sensitivity and ecological validity in that they examine the momentary relationships between mindfulness and mental health outcomes. Thus, intensive longitudinal assessment may be a more appropriate method for investigating hypothesized mechanisms of action in MBPs.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentMental Health OutcomesMindfulnessSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID35694042
PMCPMC9187214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.