ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2022
CLINICAL RESULTS OF MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The incidence and epidemiology of patellar fractures following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Insights into the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability with Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Pearls and Pitfalls-Lessons Learned from 20 Years.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Patellofemoral Instability in the Pediatric Population.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess clinical results of patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after a minimum of two years of follow-up. Methods: Patients' medical records were assessed for residual instability, patient satisfaction, and post-operative functional outcomes. Results: Fifty-one patients were analyzed, out of which 56.87% were women. Patients' mean age was 30.8 years (16 to 57 years). The mean follow-up time was 68.7 months (37 to 120 months). Length between first dislocation and surgery was less than 1 year for 58.82% of patients, between 1 and 5 years for 37.25%, and over 5 years for 3.93%. Patients showed a high degree of satisfaction (96.08% would undergo surgery again), with recurrence rate of 11.76%. Twenty-two patients reported knee symptoms, including pain from movements (72.72%), weakness (18.18%), constant pain (13.63%), and crepitus (4.54%). Considering dissatisfied patients, patients with dislocation recurrence, and patients with symptoms, five cannot practice physical activity, out of which only three blame their knee. Conclusion: MPFL reconstruction showed a recurrence rate of 11.7%, with high patient satisfaction, good functional results, and high rate of return to sports, after a minimum of two years of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.