ArticleDiabetology international2022
Incidence of interventions for diabetic retinopathy and serious lower-limb complications and its related factors in patients with type 2 diabetes using a real-world large claims database.
Article in Diabetology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The difference in type 2 diabetes care between the National Health Insurance beneficiaries and public assistance recipients in Japan: A retrospective cohort study based on claims data in a municipality.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Observational
- Article
- Effects of incentivising dialysis facilities on peripheral arterial disease care in patients undergoing haemodialysis: a claims-based cohort study.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Real-World Research on Retinal Diseases Using Health Claims Database: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Different incidences of diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment since diagnosis according to the course of diabetes diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To examine the incidence of interventions for diabetic retinopathy and serious limb complications and to elucidate the patient attributes related to the incidence of each intervention based on real-world claims data from Japan. Materials and methods: A retrospective longitudinal study design involving a 9 year (2009-2018) claims database obtained from the JMDC Inc. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 20-74 years taking antidiabetic medications were divided into two groups: "patients with newly initiated antidiabetic medication" (Group 1, Results: The incidences of the first retinopathy intervention (laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or intraocular injection), vitrectomy, and lower-limb amputations in Group 1 were 7.46, 2.37, and 0.31 /1000 person-years, respectively. Those in Group 2 were about 1.2-1.5 times higher. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents rather than insured persons were associated with a higher incidence in both groups after adjustment. While the incidence of the interventions for retinopathy hardly changed during the observation period, that of lower-limb amputations decreased by 40%, with less statistical significance ( Conclusions: We showed the incidences of the first retinopathy interventions and lower-limb amputations and their secular trends in patients with diabetes, stratified by whether the antidiabetic medication was newly initiated or not. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents were risk factors of these interventions for diabetic complications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-021-00566-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.