ArticleDiabetology international2022
Clinical practice of diabetic foot, nephropathy, and retinopathy in Japan: cross-sectional study using local and nationwide questionnaire surveys.
Article in Diabetology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Diabetic Foot Lesions and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting diabetic retinopathy stages using a simple nerve conduction measuring device, DPNCheckFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims/introduction: It is a reality that there are still many diabetic subjects who suffer from serious complications, but there are few statistics of severe eye complications such as vitrectomy or blindness and diabetic foot including amputations in Japan. Materials and methods: To determine the status of medical examination, consultation, and the actual practice for diabetic foot, retinopathy, and nephropathy, we conducted two surveys on diabetic subjects under treatment by the local physicians in Asahikawa area or in the nationwide diabetes-specialized facilities, respectively. Results: A total of 3649 diabetic subjects responded to the questionnaire from 35 clinics/hospitals in Asahikawa area. Sixty-five percent of the subjects had a routine eye examination at least once a year, but 29% of them interrupted or never attended eye examination. Besides, only 37.2% of subjects had received ankle-brachial index (ABI) test as a useful screening for diabetic foot. The nationwide survey found that 1,273,103 diabetic subjects were undergoing treatment in 472 diabetes-specialized facilities. There, lower extremity amputations accounted for 0.23% and revascularization accounted for 0.64% of the subjects. However, outpatient foot care and dialysis preventive outpatient services were offered only in 77.3% and 66.5% of the facilities, respectively. Furthermore, we found a lower availability of ophthalmologic treatments even in some of the specialized facilities. Conclusion: We considered that interruption and non-attendance of eye examinations were a barrier to prevent severe retinopathy. Our results also suggested that some of the specialized facilities may be inadequate in their efforts to detect and prevent these complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.