ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
The sST2 level is an independent influencing factor associated with atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a case-control study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A contemporary review on heart failure with improved ejection fraction.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Prognostic Value of sST2 in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Predictive value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most heart failure (HF) patients were complicated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous study has reported a correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and HF. While the association between sST2 and AF in HF patients remains elusive, which will strengthen our understanding of sST2 in HF patients. Methods: In the study, a case-control study was conducted with 306 HF patients enrolled from June 2019 to June 2020 at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. All the patients were divided into the following two groups, based on whether they AF complications prior to admission: (I) the HF group (patients with HF alone) and the HF-AF group (HF patients complicated with AF). Baseline data and sST2 levels were assessed and compared between the two groups, and the influencing factors associated with AF in HF patients were screened. Results: The sST2 level in the HF-AF group was 40.6 (25.9-53.6) ng/mL, which was significantly higher than that in the HF group [23.7 (16.3-35.9) ng/mL] (P<0.001). Correlation analysis showed that sST2 level in the HF-AF group was positively correlated with age (r=0.287, P=0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade (r=0.470, P<0.0001), left ventricular diameter (LVD) (r=0.311, P=0.001), serum creatinine (r=0.320, P<0.0001), NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (r=0.540, P<0.0001), and D-dimer (r=0.322, P<0.0001), and negatively correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (r=-0.259, P=0.004), hemoglobin (r=-0.188, P=0.039), and glomerular filtration rate (r=-0.283, P=0.002). Logistic regression analysis results indicated that history of coronary heart disease [odds ratio (OR): 0.176, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.081-0.380, P<0.0001], LVEF (OR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.915-0.998, P=0.039), LVD (OR: 1.156, 95% CI: 1.059-1.261, P=0.001), left arterial diameter (OR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.695-0.833, P<0.0001), and sST2 (OR: 0.942, 95% CI: 0.917-0.967, P<0.0001) were independent influencing factors associated with AF in HF patients. Conclusions: The sST2 level is an independent influencing factor associated with AF in HF patients, which may favor to optimize the clinical strategies in the management of HF patients complicated with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.