ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
A novel seven-gene risk profile in BALF to identify high-risk patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal heterogeneous disease with a varied clinical course that is difficult to predict. Accurate predictive models are urgently needed to identify individuals with poor survival for the optimal timing of referral for transplantation and provide some clues for mechanistic research on disease progression. Methods: We obtained the gene expression profiles of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Individuals from the GPL14550 platform were assigned to the derivation cohort (n=112) and individuals from the GPL17077 platform to the validation cohort (n=64). Univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were applied to select candidate genes for overall survival. A nomogram model was constructed based on Cox hazard regression analysis. The model was assessed by C-statistic, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) and was externally validated. Results: A nomogram model comprising seven genes was constructed. Excellent discrimination and calibration were observed in the derivation (C-index 0.815) and validation (C-index 0.812) cohorts. The AUCs for predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year survival were 0.857, 0.918, 0.930 in the derivation cohort and 0.850, 0.880, 0.925 in the validation cohort, respectively. DCA confirmed the clinical applicability of the model. A risk score based on the model was an independent prognostic predictor and could divide patients into high- and low-risk groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis displayed that high-risk patients exhibited significantly poorer survival compared with low-risk patients. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showed that high-risk patients were primarily enriched in inflammatory hallmarks, and single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) indicated that the high-risk group is closely correlated with the immune process. These lead to increased insight into mechanisms associated with IPF progression that inflammation mediated by immune response might be involved in the disease progression. Conclusions: The novel BALF seven-gene model performed well in risk stratification and individualized survival prediction for patients with IPF, facilitating personalized management of IPF patients. It deepened the understanding of the role of inflammation in IPF progression, which needs to be further studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.