ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Research output of artificial intelligence in arrhythmia from 2004 to 2021: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Artificial intelligence and cardiology in Latin America: a 5-year bibliometric analysis of scientific research].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and atrial fibrillation: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Sleep at high altitude: A bibliometric study and visualization analysis from 1992 to 2022.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis on Arrhythmia Detection and Classification from 2005 to 2022.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the advancement in machine learning (ML) and artificial neural networks as well as the development of portable electrocardiogram devices, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasing in popularity over the years. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview of the research regarding the utilization of AI techniques to improve the diagnosis of arrhythmia. Methods: We extracted data published 2004 to 2021 from Web of Science database. The online analytic platform, Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com), was used to analyze publication trends, including information about journals, authors, institutions, collaborations between countries, citations, and keywords. Results: Keywords, such as deep learning, electrocardiogram (ECG), and convolutional neural network, have been increasing in frequency over the years. The analysis outcomes demonstrated that topics associated with AI, robotic prosthesis, and big data analysis for arrhythmia have become increasingly popular since 2016. Our study also found that atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmia were the two ECG signal sharing the most interest. Conclusions: The utility of deep learning in diagnostics and the prognostication of arrhythmia has been gaining traction over the years, covering areas from electrocardiogram detection to atrial arrhythmogenesis model construction. Our study revealed the trend of topics from 2004 to 2021, which may help researchers to monitor future trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.