Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693591›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Research output of artificial intelligence in arrhythmia from 2004 to 2021: a bibliometric analysis.

Junlin Huang, Yang Liu, Shuping Huang, Guibao Ke, Xin Chen, Bei Gong, Wei Wei, Yumei Xue, Hai Deng, Shulin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junlin Huang *Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yang Liu *Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Shuping Huang *Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Guibao KeDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin ChenGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Bei GongGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WeiGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Yumei XueGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Hai DengGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Shulin WuGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the advancement in machine learning (ML) and artificial neural networks as well as the development of portable electrocardiogram devices, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasing in popularity over the years. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview of the research regarding the utilization of AI techniques to improve the diagnosis of arrhythmia. Methods: We extracted data published 2004 to 2021 from Web of Science database. The online analytic platform, Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com), was used to analyze publication trends, including information about journals, authors, institutions, collaborations between countries, citations, and keywords. Results: Keywords, such as deep learning, electrocardiogram (ECG), and convolutional neural network, have been increasing in frequency over the years. The analysis outcomes demonstrated that topics associated with AI, robotic prosthesis, and big data analysis for arrhythmia have become increasingly popular since 2016. Our study also found that atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmia were the two ECG signal sharing the most interest. Conclusions: The utility of deep learning in diagnostics and the prognostication of arrhythmia has been gaining traction over the years, covering areas from electrocardiogram detection to atrial arrhythmogenesis model construction. Our study revealed the trend of topics from 2004 to 2021, which may help researchers to monitor future trends.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaArtificial intelligence (AI)artificial neural network (ANN)bibliometric analysiselectrocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID35693591
PMCPMC9186255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.