Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693548›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2022

Evaluation and Comparison of Mucormycosis Patients' Features Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Study.

Laleh Dehghanpisheh, Mohammadhossein Eghbal, Mehrdad Salari, Reza Shahriarirad, Niloofar Borzou, Pooya Vatankhah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laleh DehghanpishehAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-5296
Mohammadhossein EghbalAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrdad SalariAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza ShahriariradThoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-495X
Niloofar BorzouAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Pooya VatankhahAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-4266
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is a serious invasive fungal infection that is one of the most aggressive and lethal of invasive mycoses. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been linked to immune dysregulation, and patients with COVID-19 have been reported to be at risk for developing invasive fungal infections. This study is conducted to evaluate the concurrence of mucormycosis among COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, hospital records of patients with mucormycosis, as well as COVID-19 admitted to Khalili Hospital, as the major referral center for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in southern Iran, were collected. Demographic and clinical information was extracted and subsequently analyzed. Results: Among 59 mucormycosis patients undergoing FESS, 41 (69.5%) were during the COVID-19 pandemic, while 18 (30.5%) were during one year before the COVID-19 pandemic. The average age was 49.33 ± 20.52, and 64.4% had diabetes mellitus, while 62.7% had COVID-19. The most common presentation was periorbital edema (56.9%), followed by necrotic tissue (48.3%). Although the total number of cases increased during the COVID-19 period compared to the case before the pandemic, the overall pattern and features of the patients had no significant difference, except regarding a significant increase in the presentation of necrotic tissue and also the use of corticosteroids. Most cases developed mucormycosis two weeks after COVID-19. The overall mortality was 36.8%, which is not statistically associated with COVID-19. Conclusion: Even in the absence of comorbidities, physicians should be aware of the risk of secondary fungal infections in patients with COVID-19 who were treated with corticosteroids.

Indexed as

COVID-19MucormycosisCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35693548
PMCPMC9175093
OpenAlexW4281789470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.