Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693456›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2022

Selectivity and Maximum Response of Vibegron and Mirabegron for β

Benjamin M Brucker, Jennifer King, Paul N Mudd, Kimberly McHale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physiological and metabolic functions of the βJournal of physiology and biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin M BruckerDepartments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Jennifer KingUrovant Sciences, Irvine, California.
Paul N MuddUrovant Sciences, Irvine, California.
Kimberly McHaleDermavant Sciences, Morrisville, North Carolina.
Myovant Sciences (United States) · USNYU Langone Health · USRoivant Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The β Objective: This study assessed the selectivity of vibegron and mirabegron for β-adrenergic receptors and the maximal effect and potency for β Methods: Functional cellular assays were performed using Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing β Results: Activation of β Conclusions: Vibegron showed no measurable β

Indexed as

adrenergic receptoroveractive bladderpharmacologyβ-adrenoreceptor

Identifiers

PMID35693456
PMCPMC9184556
OpenAlexW4280598406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.