Editorial comment: a review on radiofrequency, microwave and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Artificial ascites‑assisted microwave ablation for liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm and perioperative nursing care.Oncology letters · 2024
   Article
2. Thermal Ablation in the Liver: Heat versus Cold-What Is the Role of Cryoablation?Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
   Review
3. Current perspectives on microwave ablation of liver lesions in difficult locations.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A review on radiofrequency, microwave and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.