Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693378›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Overcoming COVID-19 disruptions: Innovations in product provision in a multi-national clinical trial among cisgender men, transgender men and transgender women in five countries.

Jacobson Cindy, Johnson Sherri, Billups Tarana, Mitterer Lynn, Chadza Mary, Gumede Sibuiswe, Manoyos Veruree, Pareja Karina, Zemanek Jillian, Jiao Yuqing and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Jacobson CindyMagee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
Johnson SherriFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Billups TaranaUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Mitterer LynnUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chadza MaryBlantyre CRS, Johns Hopkins University Research Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gumede SibuisweWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI), Johannesburg, South Africa.
Manoyos VerureeResearch Institute for Health Sciences (RIHES) Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pareja KarinaIMPACTA, Asociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion, San Miguel CRS, Lima, Peru.
Zemanek JillianStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jiao YuqingStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bauermeister JoseUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USAsociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación · PEChiang Mai University · THFamily Health International 360 · USJohns Hopkins University · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USPerinatal HIV Research Unit · ZAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials often depend on participants receiving study product to meet objectives of the protocol. Vitally important are considerations for how sites receive and dispense study product during a study while ensuring appropriate handling, accountability and compliance. The process for provision of study product is detailed in Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) which are adhered to by the research site throughout the trial. The COVID-19 pandemic unexpectedly affected the ability of study participants to receive study product. We report on the various methods implemented by trial sites to ensure timely provision of study product to participants during this unprecedented pandemic. In MTN-035, participants received 3 potential rectal microbicide formulations in randomized sequences to understand user preferences. Trial sites were permitted to revise dispensing methods to enable participants to continue to receive study product during COVID-19 restrictions. These actions mitigated disruption of study product administration and preserved the integrity of the trial. Out of the 78 participants expecting to receive study products on or after the onset of restrictions due to COVID-19, only four participants (5%) did not receive all three products. Adopting alternative methods to provide product to study participants in extraordinary circumstances was key to successful study completion and maintaining study integrity.

Indexed as

Alternative dispensing methodCOVID-19ParticipantsStudy product provision

Identifiers

PMID35693378
PMCPMC9167802
OpenAlexW4281797122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.