ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
The Development of Artificial Intelligence in Hernia Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in the rates of seroma complications between hernial sac transection and reduction after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in abdominal wall hernia surgery: clinical applications and translational readiness.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Review
- Development of machine learning-based predictive models for seroma formation after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Incisional hernia prediction using machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Observational
- Deep learning in ventral hernia imaging: automated multi-structure CT segmentation for surgical planning.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
- Role of Robotic Surgery and Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- [Roboticassisted incisional hernia surgery-Retromuscular techniques].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-What to Expect From Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Hernia Surgery.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2024Review
- Transforming Abdominal Wall Surgery With Generative Artificial Intelligence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2023Article
- Grand challenges in visceral surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence simulates human intelligence in machines that have undergone programming to make them think like human beings and imitate their activities. Artificial intelligence has dominated the medical sector to perform various patient diagnosis activities and improve communication between professionals and patients. The main goal of this study is to perform a scoping review to evaluate the development of artificial intelligence in all forms of hernia surgery except the diaphragm and upside-down hernia. Methods: The study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analyses for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) to guide the structuring of the manuscript and fulfill all the requirements of every subheading. The sources used to gather data are the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases, IEEE and Google and Google Scholar search engines. AMSTAR tool is the most appropriate for assessing the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: The study exclusively included twenty articles, whereby seven focused on artificial intelligence in inguinal hernia surgery, six focused on abdominal hernia surgery, five on incisional hernia surgery, and two on AI in medical imaging and robotics in hernia surgery. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study reveal a significant literature gap on artificial intelligence in hernia surgery. The results also indicate that studies focus on inguinal hernia surgery more than any other types of hernia surgery since the articles addressing the topic are more. The study implies that more research is necessary for the field to develop and enjoy the benefits associated with AI. Thus, this situation will allow the integration of AI in activities like medical imaging and surgeon training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.