Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

The Development of Artificial Intelligence in Hernia Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Anas Taha, Bassey Enodien, Daniel M Frey, Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Incisional hernia prediction using machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Grand challenges in visceral surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anas TahaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Bassey EnodienDepartment of Surgery, GZO- Hospital, Wetzikon, Switzerland.
Daniel M FreyDepartment of Surgery, GZO- Hospital, Wetzikon, Switzerland.
Stephanie Taha-MehlitzClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
GZO Spital Wetzikon · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence simulates human intelligence in machines that have undergone programming to make them think like human beings and imitate their activities. Artificial intelligence has dominated the medical sector to perform various patient diagnosis activities and improve communication between professionals and patients. The main goal of this study is to perform a scoping review to evaluate the development of artificial intelligence in all forms of hernia surgery except the diaphragm and upside-down hernia. Methods: The study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analyses for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) to guide the structuring of the manuscript and fulfill all the requirements of every subheading. The sources used to gather data are the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases, IEEE and Google and Google Scholar search engines. AMSTAR tool is the most appropriate for assessing the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: The study exclusively included twenty articles, whereby seven focused on artificial intelligence in inguinal hernia surgery, six focused on abdominal hernia surgery, five on incisional hernia surgery, and two on AI in medical imaging and robotics in hernia surgery. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study reveal a significant literature gap on artificial intelligence in hernia surgery. The results also indicate that studies focus on inguinal hernia surgery more than any other types of hernia surgery since the articles addressing the topic are more. The study implies that more research is necessary for the field to develop and enjoy the benefits associated with AI. Thus, this situation will allow the integration of AI in activities like medical imaging and surgeon training.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceincisional herniainguinal herniascoping reviewventral hernia

Identifiers

PMID35693313
PMCPMC9178189
OpenAlexW4281566537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.