Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693290›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022

The efficacy of anlotinib as third-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer by EGFR mutation status: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER0303 randomized phase 3 study.

Yizhuo Zhao, Qiming Wang, Li Zhang, Jianhua Shi, Zhehai Wang, Ying Cheng, Jianxing He, Yuankai Shi, Weiqiang Chen, Yi Luo and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.

Yizhuo ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qiming WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianhua ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, China.
Zhehai WangDepartment of Internal Medicine-Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China.
Ying ChengDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China.
Jianxing HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuankai ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Weiqiang ChenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Lanzhou Military General Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Yi LuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Lin WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Xiuwen WangDepartment of Chemotherapy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Kejun NanDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Faguang JinDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Tang Du Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jian DongFirst Department of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China.
Baolan LiDepartment of General Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fumihiro YamaguchiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Daniel BreadnerDivision of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Science Center, London, Canada.
Tatsuya NaganoDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Fumihiro TanakaSecond Department of Surgery, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hatim HusainDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kai LiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Baohui HanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hunan Cancer Hospital · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFoundation for Ichthyosis and Related Skin Types · USGuangzhou Medical University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNJilin Province Tumor Hospital · CNKobe University · JPLanzhou Army General Hospital · CNLondon Health Sciences Centre · CAPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShowa University Fujigaoka Hospital · JPTang Du Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anlotinib demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo as a third-line or subsequent therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ALTER0303 trial. The status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, different previous treatment may affect the efficacy of subsequent therapy, and we did this subgroup analysis to characterize the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with and without EGFR mutation. Methods: The ALTER0303 trial was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of anlotinib in patients with NSCLC who failed at least 2 lines of treatment. In the study, 138 of 437 randomized patients were EGFR mutation positive. A Cox model was used to examine the influence of previous treatment on the efficacy of anlotinib according to EGFR mutation status. Results: For patients with EGFR mutation, the OS was 10.7 and 6.3 months (HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.94, P=0.025) in the anlotinib and placebo group, respectively. The PFS was 5.6 and 0.8 months (HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.13-0.32, P<0.0001) in the anlotinib and placebo group, respectively. For patients without EGFR mutation, the OS was 8.9 months for anlotinib and 6.5 months for placebo (HR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.97, P=0.029), and the PFS was 5.4 months for anlotinib and 1.6 months for placebo (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.22-0.39, P<0.0001). In the anlotinib group, the OS and PFS for patients with and without EGFR mutation was 10.7 and 8.9 months (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95, P=0.021), 5.6 and 5.4 months (HR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75-1.34, P=1.000), respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in subgroups. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that the benefit of anlotinib as a third-line therapy for patients with NSCLC was independent of EGFR mutation status.

Indexed as

AnlotinibEGFR mutationnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)third-line

Identifiers

PMID35693290
PMCPMC9186169
OpenAlexW4282920681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.