Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693273›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2022

Sex dimorphism in response to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a narrative review.

Yingbo Huang, Hyeong Joo Cho, Barbara E Stranger, R Stephanie Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yingbo Huang *Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hyeong Joo Cho *Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Barbara E StrangerDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
R Stephanie HuangDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Genetic mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in cancer and response to therapyR01CA229618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUANG, RONG STEPHANIE, STRANGER, BARBARA E · 2019 to 2024
$2.9M
Drug repurposing in breast cancerR01CA204856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUANG, RONG STEPHANIE · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204856NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Multiple agents have been developed for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients' response to these therapies vary drastically, which indicates a need to tailor therapy. Sex is a readily usable clinical characteristic that has been shown to impact patients' response to drugs. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge, compiled from meta-analyses, on sex differences in treatment efficacy for targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC. We discuss the interplay of patient characteristics, both molecular and demographic, with sex on how they impact therapeutic response. Methods: PubMed search was performed with the term "sex/gender differences" with currently FDA approved targeting therapy and immunotherapy agents in treating NSCLC. Key Content and Findings: For targeted therapy, women tend to benefit more in terms of progression-free survival upon receiving first-generation anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment than men. On the other hand, there is an ongoing debate on sex differences in response to immunotherapy. Although preliminary, whether sex differences were observed depends on treatment settings, patient characteristics, and molecular features. Importantly, incorporating sex as a biological component in the biomarker discovery seems to reveal novel insights in immunotherapy response. Conclusions: Taken together, sex differences in responding to standard care have been observed in clinical settings for NSCLC patients. A better understanding of sex-associated treatment response and the underlying biology will improve cancer prognosis and eliminate these sex differences.

Indexed as

epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)immunotherapynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Sex dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID35693273
PMCPMC9186178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.