Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693267›Full record

ReviewComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Modern Machine-Learning Predictive Models for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases.

Eman Yahia Alqaissi, Fahd Saleh Alotaibi, Muhammad Sher Ramzan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hyperparameter optimization for cardiovascular disease data-driven prognostic system.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eman Yahia AlqaissiInformation Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1869
Fahd Saleh AlotaibiInformation Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-5164
Muhammad Sher RamzanInformation Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6752-0033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling infectious diseases is a major health priority because they can spread and infect humans, thus evolving into epidemics or pandemics. Therefore, early detection of infectious diseases is a significant need, and many researchers have developed models to diagnose them in the early stages. This paper reviewed research articles for recent machine-learning (ML) algorithms applied to infectious disease diagnosis. We searched the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Springer, and IEEE databases from 2015 to 2022, identified the pros and cons of the reviewed ML models, and discussed the possible recommendations to advance the studies in this field. We found that most of the articles used small datasets, and few of them used real-time data. Our results demonstrated that a suitable ML technique depends on the nature of the dataset and the desired goal. Moreover, heterogeneous data could ensure the model's generalization, while big data, many features, and a hybrid model will increase the resulting performance. Furthermore, using other techniques such as deep learning and NLP to extract vast features from unstructured data is a powerful approach to enhancing the performance of ML diagnostic models.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesMachine LearningAlgorithmsBig DataHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35693267
PMCPMC9185172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.