Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693078›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Improved survival with induction chemotherapy and conversion surgery in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: a single institution experience.

Yung-Yeh Su, Yu-Lin Ting, Chih-Jung Wang, Ying-Jui Chao, Ting-Kai Liao, Ping-Jui Su, Nai-Jung Chiang, I-Chuang Liao, Yu-Ting Yu, Yi-Sheng Liu and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A New CA19-9 Cutoff Value Identifies Lewis Antigen Status and Refines Prognostic Stratification in PDAC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yung-Yeh SuDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Yu-Lin TingDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Jung WangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Ying-Jui ChaoDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Ting-Kai LiaoInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Ping-Jui SuDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Nai-Jung ChiangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institute Tainan, Taiwan.
I-Chuang LiaoInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting YuDepartment of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Yi-Sheng LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Hong-Ming TsaiDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Yi-Jie LiNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institute Tainan, Taiwan.
Chien-Jui HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
I-Ting LiuDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Hui-Jen TsaiDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Chia-Jui YenDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Yan-Shen ShanInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Li-Tzong ChenDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both efficacy and tolerability are critical issues in choosing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The optimal regimen and the impact of conversion surgery on patient survival remains insufficiently reported in Asain population. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study aiming to evaluate the resection rate after different induction chemotherapy regimen and its impact toward survival. All patients with pancreatic cancer treated in our institute from 2013 to 2020, a total of 730 patients, were reviewed and 131 patients with LAPC were identified. For cohort homogeneity, 14 patients receiving induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy initially were excluded and 117 patients receiving induction chemotherapy were included in the study. Most patients (90 of 117, 77%) received triplet induction chemotherapy, including the combination of S1, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (SLOG) in 48, modified FOLFIRINOX in 21 and the combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (GOFL) in 21. The tumor response rate (19%-33%), the surgical exploration rate (38%-52%) and the mOS (15.4-23.0 months) were not significantly different among the three triplets. Both GOFL and SLOG regimen had comparable efficacy and less neutropenia as compared to mFOLFIRINOX. Conversion surgery was performed in 34 of 117 (29%) patients after induction chemotherapy. The median overall survival (mOS) in patients with and without conversion surgery were 29.1 and 14.1 months, respectively (P<0.0001). Radiological response alone was not a reliable indicator of successful conversion surgery. Patients who underwent conversion surgery had significantly better survival and thus highlighted the importance of surgical exploration in all patients who did not have progressive disease after induction chemotherapy.

Indexed as

combination induction chemotherapyconversion surgeryLocally advanced pancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID35693078
PMCPMC9185606
OpenAlexW4285739973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.