ArticleCurrent cardiovascular risk reports2021
Artificial Intelligence in Computer Vision: Cardiac MRI and Multimodality Imaging Segmentation.
Article in Current cardiovascular risk reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrast-Free Myocardial Infarction Segmentation with Attention U-Net.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Myocardial Bridging: A Scoping Review of the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in interventional cardiology: a review of its role in diagnosis, decision-making, and procedural precision.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Patient Outcomes and Future of Healthcare Delivery in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Personalized Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease: Insights into FDA-Approved Interventions and Clinical Pharmacogenetics.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
- Applications of AI in multi-modal imaging for cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
- Revival and Revision of Right Ventricular Assessment by Machine Learning.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Anatomical segmentation has played a major role within clinical cardiology. Novel techniques through artificial intelligence-based computer vision have revolutionized this process through both automation and novel applications. This review discusses the history and clinical context of cardiac segmentation to provide a framework for a survey of recent manuscripts in artificial intelligence and cardiac segmentation. We aim to clarify for the reader the clinical question of "Why do we segment?" in order to understand the question of "Where is current research and where should be?". Recent Findings: There has been increasing research in cardiac segmentation in recent years. Segmentation models are most frequently based on a U-Net structure. Multiple innovations have been added in terms of pre-processing or connection to analysis pipelines. Cardiac MRI is the most frequently segmented modality, which is due in part to the presence of publically-available, moderately sized, computer vision competition datasets. Further progress in data availability, model explanation, and clinical integration are being pursued. Summary: The task of cardiac anatomical segmentation has experienced massive strides forward within the past five years due to convolutional neural networks. These advances provide a basis for streamlining image analysis, and a foundation for further analysis both by computer and human systems. While technical advances are clear, clinical benefit remains nascent. Novel approaches may improve measurement precision by decreasing inter-reader variability and appear to also have the potential for larger-reaching effects in the future within integrated analysis pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.