Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693045›Full record

ArticleCurrent cardiovascular risk reports2021

Artificial Intelligence in Computer Vision: Cardiac MRI and Multimodality Imaging Segmentation.

Alan C Kwan, Gerran Salto, Susan Cheng, David Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current cardiovascular risk reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan C KwanDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Gerran SaltoDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Susan ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
David OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Cardiac microstructure and the immune-inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2R01HL131532 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, SUSAN, LI, DEBIAO · 2016 to 2025
$6.6M
Mediators of Systemic Inflammation and Heart Failure Risk in the CommunityR01HL143227 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, SUSAN · 2019 to 2022
$3.3M
Inflammatory Mediators, Cardiovascular Health, and Longevity in WomenR01HL134168 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, SUSAN · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Deep Learning Assessment of the Right Ventricle: Function, Etiology, and PrognosisK99HL157421 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI OUYANG, DAVID · 2021 to 2022
$313k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2020059NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL157421NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131532NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134168NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Anatomical segmentation has played a major role within clinical cardiology. Novel techniques through artificial intelligence-based computer vision have revolutionized this process through both automation and novel applications. This review discusses the history and clinical context of cardiac segmentation to provide a framework for a survey of recent manuscripts in artificial intelligence and cardiac segmentation. We aim to clarify for the reader the clinical question of "Why do we segment?" in order to understand the question of "Where is current research and where should be?". Recent Findings: There has been increasing research in cardiac segmentation in recent years. Segmentation models are most frequently based on a U-Net structure. Multiple innovations have been added in terms of pre-processing or connection to analysis pipelines. Cardiac MRI is the most frequently segmented modality, which is due in part to the presence of publically-available, moderately sized, computer vision competition datasets. Further progress in data availability, model explanation, and clinical integration are being pursued. Summary: The task of cardiac anatomical segmentation has experienced massive strides forward within the past five years due to convolutional neural networks. These advances provide a basis for streamlining image analysis, and a foundation for further analysis both by computer and human systems. While technical advances are clear, clinical benefit remains nascent. Novel approaches may improve measurement precision by decreasing inter-reader variability and appear to also have the potential for larger-reaching effects in the future within integrated analysis pipelines.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac imagingcardiac MRICardiac segmentationcomputer visionconvolutional neural networks

Identifiers

PMID35693045
PMCPMC9187294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.