Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35693005›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Evaluating the Abnormality of Bilateral Motor Cortex Activity in Subacute Stroke Patients Executing a Unimanual Motor Task With Increasing Demand on Precision.

Kate Pirog Revill, Deborah A Barany, Isabelle Vernon, Stephanie Rellick, Alexandra Caliban, Julie Tran, Samir R Belagaje, Fadi Nahab, Marc W Haut, Cathrin M Buetefisch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate Pirog RevillDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Deborah A BaranyDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Isabelle VernonDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Stephanie RellickDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Alexandra CalibanDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Julie TranDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Samir R BelagajeDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Fadi NahabDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Marc W HautDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Cathrin M BuetefischDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · USBlanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Customized cortical stimulation therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke patientsR01NS090677 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BUETEFISCH, CATHRIN M · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal contralesional M1 activity is consistently reported in patients with compromised upper limb and hand function after stroke. The underlying mechanisms and functional implications of this activity are not clear, which hampers the development of treatment strategies targeting this brain area. The goal of the present study was to determine the extent to which contralesional M1 activity can be explained by the demand of a motor task, given recent evidence for increasing ipsilateral M1 activity with increasing demand in healthy age-matched controls. We hypothesized that higher activity in contralesional M1 is related to greater demand on precision in a hand motor task. fMRI data were collected from 19 patients with ischemic stroke affecting hand function in the subacute recovery phase and 31 healthy, right-handed, age-matched controls. The hand motor task was designed to parametrically modulate the demand on movement precision. Electromyography data confirmed strictly unilateral task performance by all participants. Patients showed significant impairment relative to controls in their ability to perform the task in the fMRI scanner. However, patients and controls responded similarly to an increase in demand for precision, with better performance for larger targets and poorer performance for smaller targets. Patients did not show evidence of elevated ipsilesional or contralesional M1 blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) activation relative to healthy controls and mean BOLD activation levels were not elevated for patients with poorer performance relative to patients with better task performance. While both patients and healthy controls showed demand-dependent increases in BOLD activation in both ipsilesional/contralateral and contralesional/ipsilateral hemispheres, patients with stroke were less likely to show evidence of a linear relationship between the demand on precision and BOLD activation in contralesional M1 than healthy controls. Taken together, the findings suggest that task demand affects the BOLD response in contralesional M1 in patients with stroke, though perhaps less strongly than in healthy controls. This has implications for the interpretation of reported abnormal bilateral M1 activation in patients with stroke because in addition to contralesional M1 reorganization processes it could be partially related to a response to the relatively higher demand of a motor task when completed by patients rather than by healthy controls.

Indexed as

fMRIhand functionmotor cortexmotor recovery-cerebral infarctstroke

Identifiers

PMID35693005
PMCPMC9174784
OpenAlexW4281555242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.