ArticleEndoscopy international open2022
Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Combining techniques and technologies increases adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy: More is more.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Texture and color enhancement imaging versus white light imaging for the detection of colorectal adenomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Review
- Water-assisted colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel diseases: From technical implications to diagnostic and therapeutic potentials.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- Standard screening high-definition colonoscopy without any optimization device is no longer relevant: Time to move to optimized screening colonoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.