ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2022
Miniaturization for wearable EEG systems: recording hardware and data processing.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- From Signal Stacking to Dynamic Coupling: A Critical Review of Wearable EEG-EMG Fusion Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Smart Wearable EEG Devices: A Review of Lightweight, Multi-Sensor Systems for Sleep and Everyday Neurophysiology.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Optimizing electrode configurations for EEG mild cognitive impairment detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An Efficient Machine Learning-Based Emotional Valence Recognition Approach Towards Wearable EEG.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As more people desire at-home diagnosis and treatment for their health improvement, healthcare devices have become more wearable, comfortable, and easy to use. In that sense, the miniaturization of electroencephalography (EEG) systems is a major challenge for developing daily-life healthcare devices. Recently, because of the intertwined relationship between EEG recording and processing, co-research of EEG recording hardware and data processing has been emphasized for whole-in-one miniaturized EEG systems. This paper introduces miniaturization techniques in analog-front-end hardware and processing algorithms for such EEG systems. To miniaturize EEG recording hardware, various types of compact electrodes and mm-sized integrated circuits (IC) techniques including artifact rejection are studied to record accurate EEG signals in a much smaller manner. Active electrode and in-ear EEG technologies are also researched to make small-form-factor EEG measurement structures. Furthermore, miniaturization techniques for EEG processing are discussed including channel selection techniques that reduce the number of required electrode channel and hardware implementation of processing algorithms that simplify the EEG processing stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.