ArticleDisease markers2022
Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Ryanodine Receptor 1 (RYR1) Mutation-Associated Myopathies Using Bioinformatics Approach.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plasma Micro-RNA Signatures of Type 1 Ryanodine Receptor Related Myopathies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- An Association between OXPHOS-Related Gene Expression and Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility in Human Skeletal Muscle Biopsies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myopathies related to Ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) mutation are the most common nondystrophy muscle disorder in humans. Early detection and diagnosis of RYR1 mutation-associated myopathies may lead to more timely treatment of patients, which contributes to the management and preparation for malignant hyperthermia. However, diagnosis of RYR1 mutation-associated myopathies is delayed and challenging. The absence of diagnostic morphological features in muscle biopsy does not rule out the possibility of pathogenic variations in RYR1. Accordingly, it is helpful to seek biomarkers to diagnose RYR1 mutation-associated myopathies. Methods: Skeletal muscle tissue microarray datasets of RYR1 mutation-associated myopathies or healthy persons were built in accordance with the gene expression synthesis (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified on the basis of R software. Genes specific to tissue/organ were identified through BioGPS. An enrichment analysis of DEGs was conducted in accordance with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO). We also built protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to explore the function and enrichment pathway of DEGs and the identification of hub genes. Lastly, the ROC curve was drawn for hub genes achieving specific expressions within skeletal muscle. Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) was obtained to calculate the predictive value of key genes. The transcription factors of hub genes achieving specific expressions within skeletal muscle were predicted with the use of the iRegulon plugin. Results: We identified 170 DEGs among 11 muscle biopsy samples of healthy subjects and 17 muscle biopsy samples of RYR1 mutation-associated myopathy patients in the dataset. Among the above DEGs, 30 genes achieving specific expressions within tissues/organs were found. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs mainly focused on muscle contraction, actin-mediated cell contraction, actin filament-based movement, and muscular sliding. 12 hub genes were identified with the use of Cytoscape. Four hub genes were specifically expressed in skeletal muscle tissue, including MYH1 (AUC: 0.856), TNNT3 (AUC: 0.840), MYLPF (AUC: 0.786), and ATP2A1 (AUC: 0.765). The iRegulon predicted results suggested that the transcription factor MYF6 was found with the highest reliability. Conclusions: Four skeletal muscle tissue-specific genes were identified, including MYH1, TNNT3, MYLPF, and ATP2A1, as the potential biomarkers for diagnosing and treating RYR1 mutation-associated myopathies, which provided insights into the transcriptome-level development mechanism. The transcription factor MYF6 may be a vital upstream regulator of the above biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.