ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Safety and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of CAR-T-Cell-Based Immunotherapies in Patients With Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Recent Locoregional CAR T-Cell Trials for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Implications for Neuro-Oncology Practice.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- CAR-engineered cell therapies: current understandings and future perspectives.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Meningeal immunity and "Interstitial" therapy: a new paradigm for immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- CAR-T cell therapy in glioblastoma: from αβ to γδ T-cell platforms.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Immune Cell Interplay in the Fight Against GBM.Cancers · 2025Review
- Imaging Findings of Complications of New Anticancer Drugs.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- [Immunotherapy against gliomas].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Cytokine Modification of Adoptive Chimeric Antigen Receptor Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Bispecific T-Cell Engagers and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies in Glioblastoma: An Update.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Insight into the Progress in CAR-T Cell Therapy and Combination with Other Therapies for Glioblastoma.International journal of general medicine · 2023Review
- CAR-T cells neurotoxicity from consolidated practice in hematological malignancies to fledgling experience in CNS tumors: fill the gap.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor-macrophages: Emerging next-generation cell therapy for brain cancer.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
- Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: what can we learn from the early clinical trials? A systematic review.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with refractory hematological malignancies. However, its efficacy in glioblastoma remains unclear. Here, we performed a systematic review to summarize the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in glioblastoma. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles published before June 30, 2021 describing the use of CAR T-cell therapy in glioblastoma. Information on the toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy was summarized. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy were estimated using a random-effects model with an inverse-variance weighting model and quantile estimation method, respectively. Results: Of 397 articles identified, eight studies including 63 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with various CAR T-cell regimens were included in the analysis. Six (9.5%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome (grade ≤2), and 16 (25.4%) experienced non-critical neurological events. The pooled ORR was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-10.4; Conclusion: Although
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.