ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Following Breast Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing of postmastectomy radiation therapy in two-stage expander/implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the 2022 Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guideline.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Pooled it
- Postmastectomy radiation therapy for implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the 2022 Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Pooled it
- Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Detection of residual fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI and associated factors in women treated with mastectomy and DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- First free microvascular deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for autologous breast reconstruction in Mali: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Breast Implants in Breast Reconstruction Postmastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Autologous fat grafting and injectable fillers for post-reconstructive breast remodelling: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Model to Predict Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Complications.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Locoregional Breast Cancer Recurrences After Ablatio Mammae and Primary Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of breast reconstruction on quality of life among women after mastectomy.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- Microsurgical Strategies in Post-Radiation and Revision Breast Reconstruction: Optimizing Outcomes in High-Risk Patients.Cancers · 2025Review
- Primary Prevention Through Prophylactic Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction: An Exploratory Study on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Elicit AI and Traditional Literature Searching in Evidence Syntheses Using Four Case Studies.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2025Article
- Improving the Patient Experience in Breast Reconstruction: ERAS and Beyond.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pre-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction Intentions in Women with Breast Cancer: Psychosocial and Personality Predictors Informing Mental Health Promotion.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction in patients with Raynaud's disease: a case series and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Answering Clinical Questions on Japanese Practical Guidelines for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Post-treatment patient satisfaction in early-stage breast cancer: comparison of cryoablation versus breast conservation therapy using BREAST-Q.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Outcomes and Current State of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Surgery in Peru and Mexico.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Satisfaction and quality of life of Palestinian women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a one-year follow-up study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction is a promising surgical technique to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with breast cancer. However, the long-term risk factors associated with HRQoL after breast surgery are still unclear. Our aim was to evaluate breast satisfaction and HRQoL following breast reconstruction to identify clinical factors associated with each domain of BREAST-Q in the long-term. Methods: Patient-reported BREAST-Q outcomes were analyzed 1 and 5 years after breast reconstruction in a single-blinded, prospective study. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the risk and protective factors associated with BREAST-Q scores. These scores at 1 and 5 years were also compared across three types of operation: mastectomy only, tissue expander/implant (TE/Imp), and a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Results: Surveys were completed by 141 subjects after 1 year and 131 subjects after 5 years. Compared to mastectomy only, breast reconstruction was significantly associated with greater "Satisfaction with breasts" (TE/Imp, p < 0.001; DIEP, p < 0.001) and "Psychosocial well-being" (TE/Imp, p < 0.001; DIEP, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) resulted in lower "Satisfaction with breasts" (p = 0.004), and a history of psychiatric or neurological medication was significantly associated with "Physical well-being" at 1-year postoperatively (p = 0.02). At 5 years, reconstructive procedures were significantly positively associated with greater "Satisfaction with breasts" (TE/Imp, p < 0.001; DIEP, p < 0.001) and "Psychosocial well-being" (TE/Imp, p = 0.03; DIEP, p < 0.001), and a bilateral procedure was a significant risk factor for lower "Psychosocial well-being" (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The results of this study show that breast reconstruction improves "Satisfaction with Breasts" and "Psychosocial well-being" compared to mastectomy. Among all three types of operation, DIEP gave the best scores at 5 years postoperatively. Thus, autologous reconstruction is recommended for promotion of long-term HRQoL after breast surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.