ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of 101 Patients of Central Neurocytoma: A 10-Year Treatment Experience at a Single Institution.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- EANS-EANO guidelines on the extent of resection in gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2026Guideline
- Gamma Knife radiosurgery for central neurocytoma: a quantitative systematic review and metanalysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Central neurocytomas: Decision-making process of postoperative treatment. Lesson learned.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Improved tumor control with adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with central neurocytoma: a multicenter study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Roles and Impacts of Integrative Medical Interventions in Central Nervous System Tumor Treatment: Multi-Technology Convergence and the Paradigm Shift Toward Functional Reconstruction.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Effect of gamma knife stereotactic radiotherapy on the hematological system in patients with advanced lung cancer and its therapeutic effect.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- The clinical spectrum of central neurocytomas ranges from benign to leptomeningeal disseminating disease: a single institutional surgical series of 33 patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Central Neurocytoma with Extensive Intratumoral Hemorrhage: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2023Article
- Clinical prognostic factors for central neurocytoma and subgroup analysis of different treatment measures: A SEER database-based retrospective analysis from 2003 to 2019.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Central neurocytoma (CN) is a rare type of tumor that currently lacks an optimal treatment protocol. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcomes of CN in a cohort of 101 patients and identify prognostic factors associated with multiple treatment modalities. Methods: This monocentric study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 101 CN patients who underwent surgical resection. The patients were followed up, and their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Results: For the entire cohort, the 5- and 10-year OS rates were 88.7% and 82.8%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 86.5% and 64.9%, respectively. Of the 82 (81.19%) patients with CN who underwent gross total resection (GTR), 28 (28/82, 34.1%) also received radiotherapy (RT). Of the 19 (18.81%) patients with CN who underwent subtotal resection (STR), 11 (11/19, 57.9%) also received RT or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Compared to STR, GTR significantly improved the 5-year OS (92.4% vs. 72.4%, P=0.011) and PFS (92.4% vs. 60.4%, P=0.009) rates. Radiotherapy did not affect OS in the GTR group (p=0.602), but it had a statistically significant effect on OS in the STR group (P<0.001). However, the OS (P=0.842) and PFS (P=0.915) in the STR plus radiotherapy group were comparable to those in the GTR alone group. Compared to STR alone, STR plus radiotherapy improved the 5-year PFS rate from 25% to 75% in patients with atypical CN (P=0.004). Cox regression models and a competing risk model showed that the removal degree and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for survival. With improvements in modern radiotherapy techniques, severe radiotherapy toxicity was not observed. Conclusion: Our findings support the use of GTR whenever possible. Radiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients who undergo STR, especially in atypical CNs having a higher tendency to relapse. Close imaging follow-up is necessary. Our findings will help clinicians to select optimal, individualized treatment strategies to improve OS and PFS for patients with CN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.