Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of 101 Patients of Central Neurocytoma: A 10-Year Treatment Experience at a Single Institution.

Qiongxuan Xie, Bin Xie, Ludi Ou, Min Wang, Ziqing Tang, Yuxiang He, Xiaoyu Yang, Jidong Hong, Zhiping Lyu, Rui Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiongxuan XieDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Bin XieNational Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ludi OuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Min WangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ziqing TangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuxiang HeDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaoyu YangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jidong HongDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhiping LyuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Rui WeiDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Central neurocytoma (CN) is a rare type of tumor that currently lacks an optimal treatment protocol. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcomes of CN in a cohort of 101 patients and identify prognostic factors associated with multiple treatment modalities. Methods: This monocentric study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 101 CN patients who underwent surgical resection. The patients were followed up, and their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Results: For the entire cohort, the 5- and 10-year OS rates were 88.7% and 82.8%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 86.5% and 64.9%, respectively. Of the 82 (81.19%) patients with CN who underwent gross total resection (GTR), 28 (28/82, 34.1%) also received radiotherapy (RT). Of the 19 (18.81%) patients with CN who underwent subtotal resection (STR), 11 (11/19, 57.9%) also received RT or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Compared to STR, GTR significantly improved the 5-year OS (92.4% vs. 72.4%, P=0.011) and PFS (92.4% vs. 60.4%, P=0.009) rates. Radiotherapy did not affect OS in the GTR group (p=0.602), but it had a statistically significant effect on OS in the STR group (P<0.001). However, the OS (P=0.842) and PFS (P=0.915) in the STR plus radiotherapy group were comparable to those in the GTR alone group. Compared to STR alone, STR plus radiotherapy improved the 5-year PFS rate from 25% to 75% in patients with atypical CN (P=0.004). Cox regression models and a competing risk model showed that the removal degree and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for survival. With improvements in modern radiotherapy techniques, severe radiotherapy toxicity was not observed. Conclusion: Our findings support the use of GTR whenever possible. Radiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients who undergo STR, especially in atypical CNs having a higher tendency to relapse. Close imaging follow-up is necessary. Our findings will help clinicians to select optimal, individualized treatment strategies to improve OS and PFS for patients with CN.

Indexed as

atypical neurocytomacentral neurocytomaprognostic factorsradiotherapysurvival outcomestreatment

Identifiers

PMID35692765
PMCPMC9185842
OpenAlexW4281633980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.