Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692745›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

What Is the Most Suitable Agent Combined With Apatinib for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Fuhai Hui, Chang Xu, Xiangbo Xu, Jiangxia Chen, Hefeng Geng, Chao Yang, Yingshi Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nrf2-siRNA Enhanced the Anti-Tumor Effects of AsJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fuhai HuiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Chang XuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiangbo XuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Jiangxia ChenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Hefeng GengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Chao YangDepartment of Ethnic Culture and Vocational Education, Liaoning National Normal College, Shenyang, China.
Yingshi ZhangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University · CNShenyang Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib is superior in therapeutic effect compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To determine the most suitable agent combined with apatinib for TACE treatment, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched from inception until November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that combined therapy of TACE and apatinib (TACE+A) compared with TACE alone were included. We performed random-effect pairwise and network meta-analyses to summarize the outcomes about efficacy and safety. Results: Forty-five original studies including 3,876 patients were included. In terms of efficacy, we evaluated treatment response, 6 months overall survival (OS), 1 year OS, 6 months progression-free survival (PFS), 1 year PFS, alphafetoprotein (AFP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Significant differences always appear in TACE agent subgroups of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil from both pairwise and network meta-analysis, while significant differences could also be found in apatinib dosage of 500 and >500 mg/day subgroups and in both RCT and retrospective study subgroups. From second time network analysis, compared with TACE alone, subgroups with TACE agents of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, pirarubicin, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil ranked front. In addition, the safety of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil subgroups is acceptable. Conclusions: In conclusion, the most suitable agents in TACE combined with apatinib were adriamycin+platinum ± fluorouracil combination therapy. Systematic Review Registration: The study was registered with https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=311650, PROSPERO, CRD4202022311650.

Indexed as

advanced hepatocellular carcinomaapatinibnetwork meta-analysissystematic reviewtransarterial chemoembolization (TACE)

Identifiers

PMID35692745
PMCPMC9174538
OpenAlexW4281488579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.