Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692589›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Automatic Segmentation of Calcification Areas in Digital Breast Images.

Ammar Akram Abdulrazzaq, Yasser Muhammed, Asaad T Al-Douri, A A Hamad Mohamad, Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ammar Akram AbdulrazzaqDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technologies, Al-Maarif University College, Iraq.
Yasser MuhammedCollege of Technical Engineering, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Asaad T Al-DouriDepartment of Dental Industry, College of Medical Technology, Al-Kitab University, Iraq.
A A Hamad MohamadDepartment of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Dijlah University College, Baghdad 10021, Iraq.
Abdelrahman Mohamed IbrahimAccounting and Financial Management, School of Management Studies, University of Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-1189
Al-Farahidi UniversityDijlah University College · IQUniversity of Al Maarif · IQUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the authors hope to demonstrate that when mammography is combined with intelligent segmentation techniques, it can become more effective in diagnosing breast abnormalities and aiding in the early detection of breast cancer. In conjunction with intelligent segmentation techniques, mammography can be made more effective in diagnosing breast abnormalities and aiding in the early diagnosis of breast cancer, hence increasing its overall effectiveness. The methodology, which includes some concepts of digital imaging and machine learning techniques, will be described in the following section after a review of the literature on breast cancer (categories, prevention involving the environment and lifestyle, diagnosis, and tracking of the disease) has been completed (neural networks and random forests). It was possible to achieve these results by working with an image collection that previously had questionable regions (per the given technique). Fiji software extracted problematic candidate regions from mammography images, which were subsequently subjected to further examination. To categorize the results of the picture segmentation, they were sorted into three groups, which were as follows: random forest and neural networks both generated promising results in the segmentation of suspicious parts that were emphasized in the highlight of the image, and this was true for both algorithms. Detection of contours of the regions was carried out, indicating that cuts of these segmented sections may be created. Later on, automatic categorization of the targets can be carried out using a learning algorithm, as illustrated in the experiment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCalcinosisAlgorithmsBreastFemaleHumansMammography

Identifiers

PMID35692589
PMCPMC9187475
OpenAlexW4281739901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.